How do you figure the AG’s office has a conflict here? Your argument is essentially that since you would have to pay for counsel (which you clearly need), so should the General Assembly. That’s ridiculous. By that reasoning, we just shouldn’t have an Attorney General.
Out of curiosity - why would the author prefer outside counsel to be used in this case? After all, those are additional public funds that, IMO, are completely unnecessary in this case. And it wouldn’t change the fact that he’s a pro se plaintiff going against a member of the Bar.
How do you figure the AG’s office has a conflict here? Your argument is essentially that since you would have to pay for counsel (which you clearly need), so should the General Assembly. That’s ridiculous. By that reasoning, we just shouldn’t have an Attorney General.
Out of curiosity - why would the author prefer outside counsel to be used in this case? After all, those are additional public funds that, IMO, are completely unnecessary in this case. And it wouldn’t change the fact that he’s a pro se plaintiff going against a member of the Bar.
My thoughts for you to win this case are strongly in your favor. Thank you for the detailed information surrounding your reasons for suing .
If only we could count on the “LAW” to be as stated and not made up by men / women, who profit by their whims of entitlement.
Good luck Sir! Your win would be a first for American citizens all over our country.
Sincerely,
A concerned citizen of Virginia